First-party project · 2026-09-25
Making Adventise’s website easier to evaluate and explore
This project examines our own website. The evidence concerns content, enquiry choices and internal discovery paths; it is not a client campaign or a search-performance success story.
The starting problem
The site offered a broad range of services, but its enquiry flow focused on link building and Maps. Many generated pages repeated generic planning copy. A local HTML traversal found 1,215 indexable registry routes outside the homepage-reachable link graph: 719 location routes and 496 industry/service routes.
What we changed
- Aligned service selection, enquiry labels and the general marketing-review journey.
- Added alphabetical market and industry directories with ordinary links to retained service pages.
- Replaced awkward generated labels and added practical delivery, qualification and scope information.
- Replaced fixed Maps-ranking expectations with eligibility checks and scope-based milestones.
- Published editable work samples, project briefs and RFP material so visitors can inspect a useful output.
Verification record
Implementation verified locally on 25 September 2026
- Production build
- Passed
- SEO validation
- Passed
- Indexable registry routes outside the post-build link graph
- 0
The graph follows HTML anchors from the homepage with configured redirects resolved. It does not measure Google’s index or include sitemap discovery. Dynamic pages are checked separately.
What this establishes
A passing build and reachable pages establish specific implementation checks. They do not demonstrate ranking gains or commercial impact. First-party website implementation evidence only. No Google ranking, indexation, traffic, lead or revenue uplift has been established. The next measurement step requires a stable Search Console and qualified-enquiry baseline.